Gun control Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words - 1

Gun control - Research Paper ExampleHowever, in my opinion, I support that we simulate stark sub control laws in each country. In my country-mainland China only policemen and military can have guns. The citizens cant have guns. Due to the strict gun control laws, Chinas come to rate was in force(p)ly the lowest in the world, sound below countries such as Japan and Switzerland. Chinas homicide rate stands at 0.8 cases per 100,000 people, Japans rate is 14. Therefore, strict gun control laws are needed in order to decreasing the murder rate. There are few ways we can strict gun control laws in the follow. unrivaled does not need to look very difficult to find evidence that gun control is needed indoors the current era. The rash of mash shootings, to include the Colorado Theater shooting, Sandy Hook, as well as a great litany of others, underscores the fact that guns legally obtained through the proper channels are often successions utilized to commit these brazen acts of terr or. As such, the bang that this comes down to is what the government can seek to do with regards to limiting the supply of guns while at the same time seeking to preserve the civil rights of individuals within society. Accordingly, the following arguments leave behind certify a case for why gun control and stricter gun laws are required while at the same time presenting the case for why stricter gun laws will not necessarily improve the situation that has been thus far evidenced throughout society relating to gun crimes and/or mass shootings. Firstly, there is he stance that further gun control would help to mimic the actions that have been taken in other nations around the globe. One does not have to delve too deeply into the statistics to realize that developed economies and societies, such as Germany, France, Italy, and Great Britain, do not experience anywhere near the same levels of gun crime as does the United States (OBrien et al. 7). This is of course due to a number of r easons. The first of these has to do with the fact that the right to bear weapons system is not unique to the European nations that have thus far been listed. However, this inherent right is built into the United States Constitution with regards to the minute Amendment. This particular amendment guarantees that Congress will not impede the right of the citizen to own and bear arms. However, even a cursory analysis reveals the fact that laws such as a minimum sequence for purchasing firearms and/or the requirement to obtain a legal permit in order to conceal a weapon have already infringed upon this Second Amendment right. In this way, those who continually assert that the Second Amendment is hallowed ground that the government will never be able to infringe upon are sorely ludicrous as it has already been infringed upon, defined, and hedged by a great many different laws. An argument against further gun control in order to present the atrocities that have thus far been listed ha s to do with the fact that criminals are, by their very nature, disinterested with the impacts or repercussions of breaking the law. In this manner, seeking to engage further gun laws as a means of reducing the supply of guns available to these individual via legal channels will not necessarily solve the situation. Instead, it is reasonable to assume that if an individual intends on breaking the law in the first place, then they will equally be willing to purchase a firearm or ammunition on the black market outside of the channels of supply that the United